Just wondering. Why couldn't the political parties run people who have a propensity toward statesmanship and with more wisdom than we get from the average yes man or woman (though I've never seen of them). And then public financing of elections with free equal access to media would entice real debates. I would think the public good would gain more than the cost of financing whatever for their campaigns. I mean, can't we TRY something different? What we have isn't what we want. And it doesn't seem to be working anymore.
Oops, that had nothing to do with clean energy huh. Or as much as anything. And where's the admin response to Buffet and Gates suggesting $15B/Y or some for energy R&D? Clean E's going to happen. The USA should TRY to be out front on all the tech, even though it usually gets stolen anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment